Lantide Data

Back to Learning Center

Quick exploration vs formal numbers

Read time: ~5 minutes · Series: Business & Operations onboarding · Previous: Why sign off on the Plan · Next: How to review a Plan


A "let me just take a quick look" number made it into the weekly meeting

An analyst asked a couple of questions in Quick Analysis, and the conversation turned up "roughly 15% conversion." You pasted the screenshot into the weekly report. Finance probed the definition—no Plan, no Executed Report, and nobody can explain where this 15% came from.

Quick is good for exploring and validating ideas; a number destined for a meeting, for external use, or for a finance process should come from a focused project → a reviewed Plan → Execute → Report.


Two modes, and how the business side should tell them apart

Quick Analysis Project (Plan → Execute → Report)
Typical use Whether a column exists, whether the direction is right Campaign retrospectives, funnel disputes, sign-off-ready deliverables
Definition evidence Mostly in the conversation and SQL tabs, no complete Plan flow Plan + Report + limitations
How you should treat it Unofficial, don't use as an external number Reviewable Plan, acceptable Report
Approve & Execute No such button (not a formal project analysis) The analyst approves the Plan and formally kicks off the run

If the analyst says "this was just a quick look in Quick," then do not put the number into external materials, unless it's later upgraded into a project and completes Execute.


Common team rules (adopt them directly)

  1. External numbers must come from the Report of an Executed project
  2. Quick results are labeled "unofficial / to be confirmed" by default
  3. Finance or external PR does not accept chat screenshots or Quick conversation summaries

Aligned with PM: The quality bar.


One thing you can do right now

Next time you receive a number, ask two questions first: "Is this Quick, or an already-Executed Report?" "Which section of the Plan defines the denominator?"


Next steps